A
child or unsophisticated viewer might see in Jud Süß, Joseph Goebbels’s notorious anti-Jew costume drama, a
fairy tale in which a clever fellow from a funny-looking tribe fools a
simple-minded ruler.
|
Tibi dabo: Süss (Ferdinand Marian) and Duke (Heinrich George) in Jud Süß (1940). |
The
clever fellow is Joseph Süss Oppenheimer (Ferdinand Marian), a Jewish
moneylender. The simple-minded ruler is Karl Alexander (Heinrich George), Duke
of Württemberg, an old fool of a military man hankering after The Good Life.
The duke, used to people following his orders, is ignorant of government and
law. We see the duchy’s coat of arms dissolve into a sign in Hebrew letters on
Süss’s shop which a subtitle translates ‘Coins and Jewelry’. Within, a genteel
courtier bargains with the dowdy Süss on the duke’s behalf for a suitable gift
for the duchess.
|
A
genteel courtier bargains with the ‘devil’ in Jud Süß (1940).
|
Karl
Alexander’s governing council bores him. It does not follow his orders. This
makes him all the more delighted to discover that a cleaned-up Süss can make
The Good Life happen. Gold coins become whirling ballerinas and Süss’s
wheedling words make delightful music in the duke’s ears. Granting this
splendid fellow favors seems the least the duke can do, and the duke’s word is
law.
|
Gold coins become whirling ballerinas in Jud Süß (1940). |
Better
yet, the duke can pay off the debt he creates simply by ‘privatization’— leasing
Süss the duchy’s roads to collect tolls—and letting these ridiculous people
live within Stuttgart’s city walls (Jews were not permitted to enter German
cities at this time). Süss and his right hand Levy (Werner Krauss, who doubles
as Rabbi Loew) rub their hands with glee and lose no time in taking full
advantage of this bonanza. But Good Germans do not sit idly by.
|
Süss
(Ferdinand Marian) and Levy (Werner Krauss) in Jud Süß (1940).
|
The
story comes from a footnote in history. In the early 1700s, Württemberg’s Duke Karl
Alexander retained Oppenheimer, a successful Jewish banker in Frankfurt, as a
financial advisor. The duke borrowed heavily from Oppenheimer. He satisfied the
debt by granting Oppenheimer control over the collection of Württemberg’s taxes
and tolls. This and the banker’s subsequent actions led, after the duke died,
to a popular revolt and Oppenheimer’s hanging in 1738.
|
Good
Germans do not stand idly by in Jud Süß
(1940).
|
Jud Süß first appeared in literature in an
1827 novella by the German fairy-tale writer Wilhelm Hauff. In 1925,
German-Jewish writer Lion Feuchtwanger published Jud Süß (Jew Suess), a novel which explored the
complexities of the situation and the banker’s character and was a bestseller
in Germany and abroad (translated in English as Power). Banned by the Nazis in 1933, it was the basis for a British
costume drama, Jew Süss (1934)
directed by Lothar Mendes and released in the US as Power. Conrad Veidt, later Casablanca’s
Major Heinrich Strasser, played Süss in the
British version.
|
Karl
Alexander (Heinrich George), the Duke of Württemberg in Jud Süß (1940).
|
But
Goebbels, Hitler’s film-obsessed Reichsminister for Propaganda, rubbed his
hands like his own Süss and Levy when he saw the chance for a Nazi spin on this
tale. By this time the Third Reich controlled Germany’s film industry. Many of
the country’s top directors, stars and technicians had fled to Hollywood. Jud Süß was one of three anti-Jew films
released in 1940; the two other were Die
Rothschilds and Der ewige Jude (The Wandering Jew). David Stewart Hall,
author of Film in the Third Reich: A
Study of the German Cinema 1933-1945 (University of California Press,
1969), wrote that these films formed part of a strategy to sell the German
public the Nazis’ ‘solution’ of the Jewish Problem.
Goebbels
produced Jud Süß and reportedly
revised the screenplay. He did not miss a single opportunity to gore the
audience with the full range of negative stereotypes for
‘Jews’, to an extent that makes the film difficult viewing today.
One can imagine how heavy-handed and even silly this looks. But a German cinema
audience primed by eight years of the Nazis’ anti-Jew ideology clearly heard
the officially-sanctioned dog whistle energetically and frequently blown.
|
Good Germans confront Süss (Ferdinand Marian) in Jud Süß (1940). |
Like
the NRA’s ‘guns don’t kill people’, words and films don’t kill people either.
But leaders’ dog whistles pull triggers. Many ‘good Germans’ squared their jaws
and fell in line like their movie counterparts. Hall wrote that Jud Süß, banned for viewers under
fourteen, provoked some teenagers who saw the movie to assault Jewish citizens.
Heinrich Himmler made it mandatory viewing for the military, the SS and the
police. Hall cited Joseph Wulf, a German source who wrote from personal
experience that the film was shown to ‘Aryan’ populations, ‘especially in the
East, when “resettlements” for the death camps were imminent… It is certain
that the film was shown in order to incense in this way the “Aryan” population
against Jews in the respective countries, and thus to nip in the bud any
possible help to them on the part of the people…’
|
Motley
Jewish ‘caravan’ enters Stuttgart city walls in Jud Süß (1940).
|
Hall
also noted in 1969 this film’s strange afterlife in the Middle East, ‘where
Arabic-dubbed prints were still circulating in the 1960s’.
|
Members
of an odd-looking tribe in Jud Süß
(1940).
|
Our
unsophisticated viewer might scratch
his head over
Goebbels’s logic. The duke’s subjects
do not give him what he wants, so he seeks the
help
of
an
outsider, a member of a demonstrably ridiculous, immoral, and weak
minority. The
outsider and his associates make
the duke’s wishes come true and benefit
from concessions he
grants in return. But
rather than hold the duke accountable and restore the status quo
ante, the solution
is to eliminate the minority.
Jud Süß (Jew Süss) 1940 Germany (95 minutes)
Terra Filmkunst/International Historic Films. Directed by Veit Harlan; written
by Harlan, Ludwig Metzger and Wolfgang Eberhart Möller; cinematography by Bruno
Mondi; music by Wolfgang Zeller; produced by Joseph Goebbels.
No comments:
Post a Comment